From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 24 23:26:12 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92976FB9 for ; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 23:26:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.scaleengine.net (beauharnois2.bhs1.scaleengine.net [142.4.218.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DE592BC9 for ; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 23:26:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.1.1.1] (S01060001abad1dea.hm.shawcable.net [50.70.108.129]) (Authenticated sender: allan.jude@scaleengine.com) by mx1.scaleengine.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8FABF32DEF for ; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 23:26:02 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <52928B0C.3050609@allanjude.com> Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 18:26:04 -0500 From: Allan Jude User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What are the limits for FFS file systems? 10+ years out of date.. References: <20131124061218.GQ7069@funkthat.com> <20131124224620.GR7069@funkthat.com> In-Reply-To: <20131124224620.GR7069@funkthat.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3Pw2MjDEGVXrd2L60Qe6RmxpJxbCbfcSj" X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 23:26:12 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --3Pw2MjDEGVXrd2L60Qe6RmxpJxbCbfcSj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2013-11-24 17:46, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Warren Block wrote this message on Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 07:21 -0700: >> On Sat, 23 Nov 2013, John-Mark Gurney wrote: >> >>> Attached is a patch that bring this up to date.. This was written ba= ck >>> when we were using UFS1 w/ 32bit block addresses... Things have chan= ges >>> now that UFS2 is standard... >>> >>> The big thing is listing the memory requirements for fsck as the main= >>> limiting factor on FS size... >>> >>> I've had Kirk review the patch, and he's fine w/ it... >>> >>> Shall I just commit it? >> fsck should be either &man.fsck.8; or fsck, dependi= ng=20 >> on context. >> >> There is a duplicated "the" in the first paragraph. igor -Rz should b= e=20 >> run on the patched file. > This is a single reply, thanks to the three of you for reviewing the > patch.. it's now committed in r43236.. > > Oh, I did change a such as to e.g., and in doing so, I noticed an e.g. > w/o the trailing period... wondering if we should be consistent and > add it? > You broke the doc build. Seems you're missing the ; after your manpage entity --=20 Allan Jude --3Pw2MjDEGVXrd2L60Qe6RmxpJxbCbfcSj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSkosQAAoJEJrBFpNRJZKft+4QAK1mVhY6kWsho4IRAlzduSNi J2tjhBzfREMs6gebJDAokTGlys/JG4IqxF00ktT6xqeMVGDLunviI3NMbrtR5L/i l9n6Gy/2zE/OUhvLZ3TV9VdlZP/Wv2VyIp4W7PD3CqsU/Pa+RUJQe2CcoPJtpqqg Rgd4GUbSZl1zb6Lh/+OZjkQCeM1BIJ46S5txW06KR3/UJkvI7d6/wnc4a9nwgQML EAZH2iB5sHMLr5gRuN0nBfWmRBOYuSAtU7QyC6GvwRL0eRe/LXdifcV1B52c85Wa kapNIs3fryuvx6DxTdEJZgBEcTyLyA3JtoWlxV44GNJevxbtEBCGITllfDV9JwUt NgbtGcPTjzv6XAGgMYItuehqzwFlc2PnFsouSn/tf7ecP3Xw2GZm6Zk3z/iY1FPj cDzY9tUYx/r0FMbXwPZuPZJU47O40X7anzodc+3/iYFB8WXKireuEEtCYoBtJ6oR LY0o8EusVpPAhY087uvPsm1DPka8nnHEf79p+sBJCrTdohaVi3VnY+41jCP+/YYZ R0J10z34A+zahFhuY8PpVhIvECNbEOdAdMgBvtBOZEdO3Ry/wI8hW43yXH9ibPrj 37wWOMu50dU91OAWLFNuVvSSHdU4ZXrIhWehCIFy8fmNQvGiJafyH3YVo7qBbZ4V mspvv96ZW93K/PQcggfR =5ft8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3Pw2MjDEGVXrd2L60Qe6RmxpJxbCbfcSj--