From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Fri Sep 11 15:57:22 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F332A01AED; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:57:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.contact@marino.st) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7659B19A9; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:57:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.contact@marino.st) Received: from [192.168.0.23] (unknown [130.255.19.36]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B26043BFD; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 10:49:43 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: svn commit: r396672 - in head/mail: cyrus-imapd23 cyrus-imapd23/files cyrus-imapd24 cyrus-imapd24/files cyrus-imapd25 cyrus-imapd25/files To: Hajimu UMEMOTO , Hajimu UMEMOTO References: <201509111456.t8BEutHN088620@repo.freebsd.org> <202BFA3B83F910EE561DEC8D@ogg.in.absolight.net> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org From: John Marino Message-ID: <55F2F80A.2070907@marino.st> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:49:30 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:57:22 -0000 On 9/11/2015 5:39 PM, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > > mat> Then I'll wait for you to really look at it, because it is all so much > mat> simpler. > ume> No! I don't have such time to do so. > If you don't back it out, I'll resign all of my ports, sigh. Given that you said you don't have time for port maintenance (even to review improvements) maybe that's not such a bad thing. Portsmon is also showing a bunch of open PRs on these ports.... I'm not encouraging a resignation, and I've had my own issues with "change for change's sake" but this seemed to be significant work so I'd like to see real proof that it was wrong before a back out byself... (As just an observer, nobody important) John