From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 27 05:47:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B776916A4CE; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 05:47:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from randomservers.com (randomservers.com [69.55.237.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A0BF43D48; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 05:47:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joseph@randomnetworks.com) Received: from [192.168.1.253] (c-24-7-164-83.client.comcast.net [24.7.164.83]) (authenticated bits=0) by randomservers.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id iBR5l7IY099188 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 26 Dec 2004 21:47:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from joseph@randomnetworks.com) X-Authentication-Warning: randomservers.com: Host c-24-7-164-83.client.comcast.net [24.7.164.83] claimed to be [192.168.1.253] In-Reply-To: <200412251246.iBPCk2oZ027897@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200412251246.iBPCk2oZ027897@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Joseph Scott Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 21:48:28 -0800 To: trevor@freebsd.org, Edwin Groothuis X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on randomservers.com cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/astro/celestia Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 05:47:11 -0000 On Dec 25, 2004, at 4:46 AM, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > edwin 2004-12-25 12:46:02 UTC > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > astro/celestia Makefile > Log: > add dependency on graphics/libglut Looking at related PRs, does this imply that ports/68252 is moot? -- Joseph Scott http://joseph.randomnetworks.com/