From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 4 13:14:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39CFA1065673 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 13:14:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1136E8FC08 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 13:14:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [96.47.65.170]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BE7FA46B0A; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 08:14:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 42F55B944; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 08:14:08 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 08:09:38 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110714-p8; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <4F041C54.4010904@my.gd> In-Reply-To: <4F041C54.4010904@my.gd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201201040809.38706.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Wed, 04 Jan 2012 08:14:08 -0500 (EST) Cc: Damien Fleuriot Subject: Re: Any recommendations for a 10G NIC from Broadcom X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 13:14:09 -0000 On Wednesday, January 04, 2012 4:31:00 am Damien Fleuriot wrote: > On 1/4/12 6:10 AM, Vijay Singh wrote: > > Hi. I would like to try out a 10G NIC from Broadcom. The BCM5716 seems > > promising. I am looking for features such as multi-queue, MSI-X, TSO > > etc. Any recommendations would be greatly appreciated. > > > > > Now, I'm going to offer you an indirect response. > > Jack Vogel, who works at Intel, writes and maintains the code for most > (all?) the Intel NICs on FreeBSD. > > If I had to make a choice between Broadcom and Intel, I'd go with Intel > for this very reason. OTOH, Broadcom also has a commiter on staff who helps to maintain FreeBSD drivers (David Christensen - davidch@). There is a bxe(4) driver in 9.0 and later (albeit missing a manpage) which supports some Broadcom 10G NICs: BCM57710, BCM57711, and BCM57711E. -- John Baldwin