Date: Fri, 15 May 1998 00:30:02 +0200 From: "IBS / Andre Oppermann" <andre@pipeline.ch> To: Manar Hussain <manar@ivision.co.uk> Cc: isp@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bandwidth limiter available Message-ID: <355B706A.C08A4A3D@pipeline.ch> References: <199805141623.SAA00965@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> <3.0.5.32.19980514223309.00929c00@stingray.ivision.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Manar Hussain wrote: > > > Are these limits hi-caps per instant on bandwidth? Is it possible > >to configure a limit over a time period or modify this to do so? > > And/or a means to let bandwidth increase if it's available or even better - > set minimum and maximum bandwidths that some pipes can see where the max is > only reached if there is enough free traffic and then never exceeded (or > even some more general rule set means). Use ALTQ: http://www.csl.sony.co.jp/person/kjc/programs.html#ALTQ Does dynamic BW limiting better than a static ipfw rule. To -hackers: When gets this code merged to -current and what about the if_dequeueing abstraction layer Kenjiro Cho is suggesting? Cisco beware! We are on the way with picoBSD booting from PCCARD and Zebra (http://www.zebra.org), a BGP4/OSPFv2/RIPii routing daemon (yea! delete that crappy gated s***). The last thing we need on our way is a Cisco-IOS shell integrating all those features under the well-known IOS command syntax. Beat 'em! (BTW, just my $0.02) -- Andre Oppermann CEO / Geschaeftsfuehrer Internet Business Solutions Ltd. (AG) Hardstrasse 235, 8005 Zurich, Switzerland Fon +41 1 277 75 75 / Fax +41 1 277 75 77 http://www.pipeline.ch ibs@pipeline.ch To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?355B706A.C08A4A3D>