From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 23 21:31:42 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1D28D38;
 Wed, 23 Jan 2013 21:31:42 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from rizzo.unipi@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-lb0-f171.google.com (mail-lb0-f171.google.com
 [209.85.217.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06006E5;
 Wed, 23 Jan 2013 21:31:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lb0-f171.google.com with SMTP id gg13so4946099lbb.2
 for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 13:31:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
 :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
 bh=xK7P6FMCraSo+D+GPtnZzG/sez00jwel/VgCAcPRDZc=;
 b=aPJYIU4wynCUVePA8GOHNpXr9x93qfb3U+ajyrSQibz/+lWBvbSbzVCrSc2NefnobK
 aUJj1ImL28fxYyNmRRK7UpHfTWmXZ8HFQca+cUL6Y6hXoz3UCx5BbOk9WFTG2mBL49X0
 D9VTOaZWQJuLlJfMIOIxKh7ImDGh5XE4m9DGjq80EqO8+jgyG0MoQBscrGhEs1E8WNSM
 mQW6KrzzVbVDsUDlV5mnInZCa9td9h7SQkpGU6UZ3dM8yY6icRrGQ6HKNj9tB2GmonpW
 UVPyOBPdn1JBP1geLrmd/vNFpVB6KEKigFuO4UAsfiP+n7Pnv89K19m9ESHE+g6RGr5b
 cBjg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.102.9 with SMTP id fk9mr1323907lbb.100.1358976700604;
 Wed, 23 Jan 2013 13:31:40 -0800 (PST)
Sender: rizzo.unipi@gmail.com
Received: by 10.114.93.200 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 13:31:40 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <51003956.50301@FreeBSD.org>
References: <20130123163238.GB56212@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>
 <51003956.50301@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 13:31:40 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 6pgT4-eU0wPz3Ha7wtcuTLoLBuc
Message-ID: <CA+hQ2+hBgLXa+fyFEUN+wLDct1+HXcoEHZivqtdWDLAhjJ=Uag@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: __builtin_memcpy() slower than memcpy/bcopy (and on linux it is
 the opposite) ?
From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it>
To: Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Cc: current@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 21:31:42 -0000

On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org> wrote:

> Which compilation flags did you use to test this?  When I compiled your
> testcase program with clang 3.2, gcc 4.2 and gcc 4.7 at -O2, with all
> other settings at their defaults, all three compilers just called libc's
> memcpy() for the __builtin_memcpy tests.
>

just -O2 -Wall -Werror, no special -m* or -f* flags

cheers
luigi