From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 27 00:26:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4234916A420 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2006 00:26:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.ntplx.net (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F2B43D5A for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2006 00:26:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.ntplx.net (8.13.5/8.13.5/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id k0R0QYVR021397; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:26:34 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:26:34 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net To: kurt@intricatesoftware.com In-Reply-To: <200601261921.27799.lists@intricatesoftware.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.ntplx.net) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: read hang on datagram socket X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Eischen List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 00:26:38 -0000 On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Kurt Miller wrote: > On Thursday 26 January 2006 6:56 pm, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Kurt Miller wrote: > > > > > I'm working on 1.5 jdk certification on 5.4 and 6.0. One of the jck > > > tests hangs on 5.4 but works ok on 6.0. I've reduced the problem > > > down to the following C program that hangs on 5.4 but works fine > > > (finishes) on 6.0 and 4.11. > > > > > > I could use some assistance with finding a work-around to the > > > problem or an explanation as to why the program hangs on 5.4. > > > > It exit'd in the last connect() in Solaris 9. I modified it > > to work -- see below. > > Thanks, that was my bug (the jdk did it right). It Sill hangs on 5.4 > though. The modified version does not hang on 5.2. Do you have multiple interfaces on your 5.4 box? What happens when you try using non-zero IP addresses and ports? -- DE