Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 15:37:30 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Stefan Esser <se@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD for serious performance? Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1212131534570.3825@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <50C9DABA.1020008@freebsd.org> References: <20121211204323.310760@gmx.com> <CAJ-Vmok-DtKwNW2DJ21E_UBcf%2B3CWHJ0Z8FyiNC=mycKUFNuBA@mail.gmail.com> <50C889D3.1050404@freebsd.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1212122324230.1449@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <50C9DABA.1020008@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> There is no technical reason that SATA drives are less reliable with > regard to hardware (bit density, BER, ...) and firmware (less strict > conformance testing compared to SAS drives), but there are market > forces that have this effect. The only sentence i could agree. But actually it is mostly propaganda to sell nearly same thing at 5x price.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1212131534570.3825>