Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 13 Dec 2012 15:37:30 +0100 (CET)
From:      Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To:        Stefan Esser <se@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD for serious performance?
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1212131534570.3825@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
In-Reply-To: <50C9DABA.1020008@freebsd.org>
References:  <20121211204323.310760@gmx.com> <CAJ-Vmok-DtKwNW2DJ21E_UBcf%2B3CWHJ0Z8FyiNC=mycKUFNuBA@mail.gmail.com> <50C889D3.1050404@freebsd.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1212122324230.1449@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <50C9DABA.1020008@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> There is no technical reason that SATA drives are less reliable with
> regard to hardware (bit density, BER, ...) and firmware (less strict
> conformance testing compared to SAS drives), but there are market
> forces that have this effect.

The only sentence i could agree.

But actually it is mostly propaganda to sell nearly same thing at 5x 
price.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1212131534570.3825>