Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 00:55:55 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome <freebsd@meijome.net> To: RW <fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: flash Message-ID: <20070703005555.3b124871@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20070702140041.0ed62904@gumby.homeunix.com.> References: <54357.74.64.6.149.1183317914.squirrel@mail.el.net> <18056.11717.973968.984604@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20070702011717.47687ee9@gumby.homeunix.com.> <200707011937.57100.freebsd@dfwlp.com> <20070702140041.0ed62904@gumby.homeunix.com.>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 14:00:41 +0100
RW <fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> wrote:
>
> The problem with Flash7 is that it works mainly with youtube and
> similar sites, and with irritating adverts.
hardly the fault of the port ;-)
> So if you don't much use
> youtube, it's worse than nothing. It wont work with sites that use
> flash for navigation.
I've found Flash 7 to work pretty damn well in, say, 90% of the websites. In
the remaining 10%, it's blocked by the content creators and Macromedia wanting
me to upgrade. No crashes, no issues with navigations.
What sites have you had problems with?
B
_________________________
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
Law of Conservation of Perversity:
we can't make something simpler without making something else more complex
I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet.
Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been
Warned.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070703005555.3b124871>