Date: 16 Feb 2001 15:49:28 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca> Cc: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>, Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Wish List (was: Re: The /usr/bin/games bikeshed again) Message-ID: <xzp1ysylm2v.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group's message of "Fri, 16 Feb 2001 06:30:27 -0800" References: <200102161431.f1GEVCX28090@cwsys.cwsent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca> writes: > Rdist was also discussed. Rdist5, rdist6, and rsync should share the > same status. Some of us have vendor and FreeBSD systems, use rdist5. > Others use Linux and FreeBSD system, use rdist6. Others, like myself, > use rsync. Too bad this discussion just fizzled out with no decision. I wouldn't be sorry to see the r* utilities (rsh, rcp, rmt...) disappear either. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp1ysylm2v.fsf>