From owner-cvs-all Sun Jan 10 17:38:51 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA12619 for cvs-all-outgoing; Sun, 10 Jan 1999 17:38:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA12614 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 1999 17:38:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA26954; Sun, 10 Jan 1999 17:24:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from s204m82.isp.whistle.com(207.76.204.82) via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpdv26944; Mon Jan 11 01:24:41 1999 Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 16:24:44 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer X-Sender: julian@s204m82.isp.whistle.com To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: Poul-Henning Kamp , sthaug@nethelp.no, des@flood.ping.uio.no, darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au, committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sysctl descriptions In-Reply-To: <53005.915999459@zippy.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk I know I'm not dore but hey.. are there lobyists? I think it's useful especially if easily disabled when RAM counts/ On Sun, 10 Jan 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > No, I don't want to push it to a -core vote, I merely used our CVS > > convention to indicate where DES could take this as the next step > > if he wanted to be (more) confrontational. > > Well, it sounds like that's what we've got anyway. Since we don't > have another mechanism for this yet, it's time to call for a core vote > on it or deal with another several days' worth of bickering. Myself, > I'll take the vote. > > - Jordan > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message