Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 11:13:37 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: chromium@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 258576] www/chromium: build fails with harfbuzz 3.0.0 Message-ID: <bug-258576-28929-jMiejeSjFp@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-258576-28929@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-258576-28929@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D258576 --- Comment #6 from Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Tomoaki AOKI from comment #5) I'm neither familar (to review) nor use this port (to QA). It takes too much time[1] (at least 4 hours) to test on my hardware, blocking work on other ports. The work here is complete (waiting for confirmation), so it's too la= te to bundle other changes in order to test together. [1] Chromium used to support https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unity_build simi= lar to Firefox but removed later, see https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/chromium-dev/c/DP9TQszzQLI/m/pZ7= aC8GbDAAJ ccache wouldn't help with initial or infrequent builds (e.g., old cache= is useless after a major update). It also requires fast storage and tons of sp= ace to accomodate multiple release/architectures and multiple ports. Each of th= ose would probably want a separate CCACHE_DIR. I don't use ccache myself in ord= er to reduce SSD wear and avoid ccache-specific issues. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-258576-28929-jMiejeSjFp>