From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 26 21:28:49 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96798E6C; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 21:28:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69B68C8B; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 21:28:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.22] (unknown [130.255.19.191]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEFDF43C1F; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 16:28:41 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <55147A01.8080201@marino.st> Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 22:28:33 +0100 From: John Marino Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bryan Drewery , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r382341 - in head/lang: gcc46 gcc47 gcc48 gcc49 gcc5 References: <201503262036.t2QKa4Aw076378@svn.freebsd.org> <55147032.4020401@FreeBSD.org> <551470F9.60306@marino.st> <551472A3.8000105@FreeBSD.org> <5514746C.5010909@marino.st> <55147853.30309@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <55147853.30309@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 21:28:49 -0000 On 3/26/2015 22:21, Bryan Drewery wrote: > > You again ignore everything I say here. You then justify it because 1 > portmgr approved it, and then go on to tell me portmgr is a committee. > This blanket was never officially voted on. You can't have it both ways. > AFAIK changing -pthread to -lpthread was not voted on either. You said it yourself; you've been anti-DragonFly from day 1, and nothing I do will change that. You are not neutral on this topic. Yours is the only anti-DragonFly feedback I get. Everyone else seems pleased with my work and nobody else is complaining about the additions. I can infer they think the positive far outweighs the negative. So yeah -- I'm going to ask for a consensus when it comes to anti-DragonFly vitriol. Thanks. John