From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Feb 29 20:33:18 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1233)
	id C39231065670; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:33:18 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:33:18 +0000
From: Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org>
To: Chuck Burns <break19@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20120229203318.GA88216@freebsd.org>
References: <20120226213703.GA33988@freebsd.org> <4F4D34C8.9080507@FreeBSD.org>
	<20120228221149.GA95661@freebsd.org>
	<4F4D5B63.6020306@FreeBSD.org> <4F4D6C7D.3030109@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4F4D6C7D.3030109@gmail.com>
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: setting CC/CXX/CPP unconditionally in src.conf
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:33:18 -0000

On Tue Feb 28 12, Chuck Burns wrote:
> On 2/28/2012 4:55 PM, Ade Lovett wrote:
> >On 2/28/2012 14:11, Alexander Best wrote:
> >>any chance we can have a CFLAGS.gcc and CFLAGS.clang in the future?
> >>that would
> >>make certain things a lot easier. dealing with gcc specific options,
> >>such as
> >>-mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 would simply work by setting
> >>CFLAGS.gcc=-mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 e.g.
> >
> >You already can:
> >
> >CFLAGS.cc= cc_cflags_here
> >CFLAGS.clang= clang_cflags_here
> >
> >CFLAGS+= generic_cflags_here
> >CFLAGS+= ${CFLAGS.${CC}}
> >
> >
> >-aDe
> 
> I think was asking for adding a third...
> .cc for base gcc
> .clang for .. clang......
> and .gcc for ports gcc4x
> ..
> 
> At least, thats how I read it, I could be wrong, it's happened before.

no you're right. ade's example suits users very well who want to use it in
their src.conf. however what i had in mind was something that can be put into
the makefiles by developers and which is implemented in *.mk mannor.

cheers.
alex

> 
> Chuck
>