From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Sep 13 17:54:45 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E2D106564A;
	Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:54:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com)
Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 740EA8FC18;
	Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:54:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (pD9FBE9F1.dip.t-dialin.net
	[217.251.233.241]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id p8DHsgWI016270;
	Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:54:43 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com)
Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41])
	by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p8DHsbo8062887;
	Tue, 13 Sep 2011 19:54:37 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from jhs@berklix.com)
Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p8DHsUXo061135;
	Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:54:36 GMT (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net)
Message-Id: <201109131754.p8DHsUXo061135@fire.js.berklix.net>
To: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org>
From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com>
Organization: http://www.berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany
User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://www.berklix.com/free/
X-URL: http://www.berklix.com
In-reply-to: Your message "Tue, 13 Sep 2011 18:44:37 BST."
	<CADLo83-ZcVAeyznw5DtEHV1tOsBUrZLLR2HJxFjrX_QewpHysA@mail.gmail.com> 
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 19:54:30 +0200
Sender: jhs@berklix.com
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Matthias Andree <mandree@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: ports-system priorities rant (Re: sysutils/cfs) 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:54:46 -0000

Hi,
Reference:
> From:		Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org> 
> Date:		Tue, 13 Sep 2011 18:44:37 +0100 
> Message-id:	<CADLo83-ZcVAeyznw5DtEHV1tOsBUrZLLR2HJxFjrX_QewpHysA@mail.gmail.com> 

Chris Rees wrote:
> On 12 September 2011 22:18, Julian H. Stacey <jhs@berklix.com> wrote:
> > Matthias Andree wrote:
> >> >> An obscure piece of software is undesirable (and shouldn't be ported in
> >> >> the first place).
> >> >
> >> > Bullshit!
> >>
> >> I think that suffices.  If the discussion is getting emotional, we
> >> should stop it.
> >
> > No. You should stop advocating killing ports, or leave, or be revoked.
> > FreeBSD would be better without immature ports slaughterers.
> >
> 
> Julian,
> 
> Your arguments have become excessively ad-hominem, and please don't
> think you're upsetting anyone in the slightest with them.
> 
> Use rational and technical arguments, or take a break.
>
> Chris

Your proposal to remove procmail among others was ridiculous.
Please consider resigning Chris. 

Cheers,
Julian
-- 
Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com
 Reply below, not above;  Indent with "> ";  Cumulative like a play script.
 Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable.
 http://www.softwarefreedomday.org 17 Sept,  http://berklix.org/sfd/ 22 Oct.