From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Mar 9 22:41:02 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id WAA06880 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 9 Mar 1995 22:41:02 -0800 Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id WAA06874 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 1995 22:41:00 -0800 Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin.Root.COM [198.145.90.18]) by Root.COM (8.6.8/8.6.5) with ESMTP id WAA02032; Thu, 9 Mar 1995 22:40:52 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.9/8.6.5) with SMTP id WAA00143; Thu, 9 Mar 1995 22:40:52 -0800 Message-Id: <199503100640.WAA00143@corbin.Root.COM> X-Authentication-Warning: corbin.Root.COM: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: Gary Roberts cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: SNAP or current? In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 10 Mar 95 16:21:44 +1000." <9503100621.AA26597@wcs.uq.edu.au> From: David Greenman Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM Date: Thu, 09 Mar 1995 22:40:46 -0800 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >Poul-Henning Kamp writes: >> >> > Which is more stable right now: the latest SNAP, or current? >> >> current is pretty good just now I think. > >>From previous comments I've seen, 2.1 is timed for April (perhaps a month >from now). The last SNAP is a month old. If -current is good right now, >is anyone likely to roll a new SNAP? Just curious ... It's planned - probably in a week or two...Poul's been working on it. 2.1-Alpha probably not until mid-late April at the rate we're going; 2.1-Beta and 2.1R not likely until sometime in May. These are just guesses based on the current state of brokeness and the current rate of progress. -DG