From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Sep  2 01:12:22 2003
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5D43A16A4BF; Tue,  2 Sep 2003 01:12:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0395C4400F; Tue,  2 Sep 2003 01:12:21 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h828CIi8043018;
	Tue, 2 Sep 2003 10:12:18 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@nsu.ru>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 02 Sep 2003 14:57:26 +0700."
             <20030902075726.GB72639@regency.nsu.ru> 
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 10:12:18 +0200
Message-ID: <43017.1062490338@critter.freebsd.dk>
cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org
cc: Doug Barton <DougB@freebsd.org>
cc: src-committers@freebsd.org
cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/rescue/rescue Makefile 
X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree <cvs-src.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-src@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 08:12:22 -0000

In message <20030902075726.GB72639@regency.nsu.ru>, Alexey Dokuchaev writes:
>On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 12:50:23AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> 
>> > NOATM and NOINET6 were preexisting options, and rather than start
>> > the "1.0 compatibility at any cost!" bikeshed I simply have propagated
>> > them to other relevant places.
>> 
>> The last few times this came up, the consensus was for WORD_SEPERATORS
>> in new options.
>
>I second this consensus.
>Does anyone consider renaming those knobs that we don't have to rely on
>being particularly named for compatibility with older FreeBSD versions?
>(Just wondering.)

The crucial word here is "_new_ options", these were existing options.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.