Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 18:49:53 -0400 From: Ryan Steinmetz <zi@freebsd.org> To: "Sergey A. Osokin" <osa@freebsd.org> Cc: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: cc298297bc51 - main - www/nginx: Undo previous commit Message-ID: <YKbnkUbrFSlKUmmc@exodus.zi0r.com> In-Reply-To: <YKbfNDQydHkc779%2B@FreeBSD.org> References: <202105201640.14KGe1ZO031052@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <20210520195721.GA9374@lonesome.com> <YKbApePuJJ90RSNV@exodus.zi0r.com> <YKbXBw5mPqnWFu%2BZ@FreeBSD.org> <YKbYYsgpTkrG4RlT@exodus.zi0r.com> <YKbfNDQydHkc779%2B@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On (05/20/21 22:14), Sergey A. Osokin wrote: > >There're hundreds and hundfreds patches are available with a different >quality. Are we really on position to add all of those just because >they're not enabled by default? Really? > I'm not adding hundreds of patches. I'm re-adding one, to the more than 80 existing addons/patches/modules that are options in the www/nginx port today. Almost all of which exist because the nginx development team have not chosen to make their functionality native. I don't think there's any valid cause to single this one out. -r >-- >Sergey -- Ryan Steinmetz PGP: 9079 51A3 34EF 0CD4 F228 EDC6 1EF8 BA6B D028 46D7
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?YKbnkUbrFSlKUmmc>