From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Oct 30 03:30:52 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 589DDA8A;
 Wed, 30 Oct 2013 03:30:52 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org)
Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27DAA2F03;
 Wed, 30 Oct 2013 03:30:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from Julian-MBP3.local
 (ppp121-45-253-246.lns20.per2.internode.on.net [121.45.253.246])
 (authenticated bits=0)
 by vps1.elischer.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r9U3UjXT021610
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
 Tue, 29 Oct 2013 20:30:48 -0700 (PDT)
 (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org)
Message-ID: <52707D60.1070001@freebsd.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 11:30:40 +0800
From: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>, Navdeep Parhar <np@FreeBSD.org>,
 Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it>
Subject: Re: MQ Patch.
References: <40948D79-E890-4360-A3F2-BEC34A389C7E@lakerest.net>	<526FFED9.1070704@freebsd.org>
 <CA+hQ2+gTc87M0f5pvFeW_GCZDogrLkT_1S2bKHngNcDEBUeZYQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <52701D8B.8050907@freebsd.org> <527022AC.4030502@FreeBSD.org>
 <527027CE.5040806@freebsd.org> <5270309E.5090403@FreeBSD.org>
 <5270462B.8050305@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <5270462B.8050305@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Randall Stewart <rrs@lakerest.net>,
 "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <net@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 03:30:52 -0000

On 10/30/13, 7:35 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>
> The holy grail so to say would be to run the entire stack with full
> affinity up and down.  That is certainly possible, provided the 
> application
> is fully aware of it as well.  In typical mixed load cases this is 
> unlikely
> the case and the application(s) are floating around.
with multithreaded apps it's *most likely* that writes will be coming 
from several differnent CPUs..