Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 20:34:28 +0000 From: Nuno Teixeira <eduardo@freebsd.org> To: Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD ports community is broken [port building configuration notes] Message-ID: <CAFDf7UJ9coGqsL8OX0TrigXvM9ZZaHQk-EdeJoWuxk19g%2BvWSg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4A386631-E8FF-4640-A927-46DE38F07F00@yahoo.com> References: <87B38D6C-1D83-4158-B03B-F4C8EA396DD1@yahoo.com> <C2D38005-534B-44D6-8C1B-88756A946229@yahoo.com> <B623B102-F70D-4FD5-99F3-6E60B9D31187@yahoo.com> <E2CB9BBD-007E-4B97-9711-682571BD5DF0@yahoo.com> <4A386631-E8FF-4640-A927-46DE38F07F00@yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello Mark, > Context: 1GHz, 4 core, cortex-a7 (armv7), 2 GiBytes RAM, USB2. > RAM+SWAP: 5.6 GiBytes. Also, this is doing my normal armv7 (and > aarch64) style of devel/llvm* build: OPTION'd to BE_NATIVE > instead of BE_STANDARD and OPTION'd to not build MLIR. llvm BE_NATIVE/without MLIR seems the best option for this kind of hardware. I will test it right away and compare times. Related to rust, it have an experimental option to build with port llvm instead of bundled. Have you test it? Tomorow I will do this builds and share results. Note: I did not change llvm default options in the past because I was concerned about it affects testports. But, I need to give it a go, because build times are impressive. Thanks! -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD Committer (ports)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFDf7UJ9coGqsL8OX0TrigXvM9ZZaHQk-EdeJoWuxk19g%2BvWSg>