From owner-freebsd-ports  Thu Aug  1 17:42:52 1996
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id RAA08196
          for ports-outgoing; Thu, 1 Aug 1996 17:42:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from grog@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id RAA08190;
          Thu, 1 Aug 1996 17:42:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: Greg Lehey <grog>
Message-Id: <199608020042.RAA08190@freefall.freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Emacs 19.31
To: imp@village.org (Warner Losh)
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 1996 17:42:51 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: ports@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199608011538.JAA25772@rover.village.org> from "Warner Losh" at Aug 1, 96 09:38:29 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> : Yes, I've been using it for some time inexactly this configuration.
> : On the other hand, you may be looking in the wrong place: this looks
> : like a mismatch between Emacs and the X server (assuming you're using
> : the X version) or the terminal emulator (assuming you're not).  I run
> : XInside to a different machine (BSD/OS), and this may account for the
> : differences.
> 
> Interesting data point.  I'll have to keep that in mind.
> 
> It's happen on *BOTH* the X server version and identically oddly in
> the xterm that I'm running on an NCD X Terminal or xterm that ships
> with Solaris 2.5.1 and the xterm that is in X11R6.1 built on Solaris
> 2.5.1.  The xterms behaved the same displayed on my XFree86 3.2.1
> server and on Solaris' openwindows server (Haven't tried the X server
> that gets built as part of X11R6.1).

When you say you're working with xterms, do you mean that?  Normally,
under X you'll let Emacs open its own window.

> I don't have any real, working
> VT100s to try it on.

I think that you can assume that it's not a generic VT100 problem.

Greg