From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 15:50:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B291916A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:50:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [128.30.28.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EF1443D60 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:50:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i8UFob8g072605 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK CN=khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu issuer=SSL+20Client+20CA); Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:50:38 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id i8UFobik072602; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:50:37 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:50:37 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200409301550.i8UFobik072602@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Ceri Davies In-Reply-To: <20040930122154.GS2493@submonkey.net> References: <861xgm5ltz.fsf@thirst.unx.era.pl> <20040928194853.GT2493@submonkey.net> <86k6ud2t6t.fsf@thirst.unx.era.pl> <20040929131136.GA2493@submonkey.net> <86mzz8x8zv.fsf@thirst.unx.era.pl> <20040930122154.GS2493@submonkey.net> X-Spam-Score: -19.8 () IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.37 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 12:17:19 +0000 cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bug in #! processing X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:50:41 -0000 < said: > Good, I'm not losing my eyesight then. In theory this means that we're > free to do whatever we want, as the commit log for revision 1.21 of > imgact_shell.c suggests. Just to clear there air here: POSIX does not specify, and by design and intention has never specified, the "#! hack" or any other means for making scripts directly executable. -GAWollman