From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 17 15:07:27 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BAC8A46; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 15:07:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) Received: from esa-jnhn.mail.uoguelph.ca (esa-jnhn.mail.uoguelph.ca [131.104.91.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 139B6AE9; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 15:07:26 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqEEALbwIFGDaFvO/2dsb2JhbABEhkm5U4EUc4IfAQEBBAEBASAEJyALGw4KAgINGQIpAQkmBggHBAEcBIdxDKwbkUaBI4xTgQ00B4ItgRMDiGeLDYI4gR2PO4MlT4EFNQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,682,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="17042533" Received: from erie.cs.uoguelph.ca (HELO zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca) ([131.104.91.206]) by esa-jnhn.mail.uoguelph.ca with ESMTP; 17 Feb 2013 10:07:20 -0500 Received: from zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DD5AB3FAD; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 10:07:20 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 10:07:20 -0500 (EST) From: Rick Macklem To: Marc Fournier Message-ID: <465448349.3084923.1361113640094.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> In-Reply-To: <25D0357F-4E1A-457A-A046-87319864738C@hub.org> Subject: Re: 9-STABLE -> NFS -> NetAPP: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: [172.17.91.201] X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.10_GA_2692 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Win)/6.0.10_GA_2692) Cc: Konstantin Belousov , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, John Baldwin X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 15:07:27 -0000 Marc Fournier wrote: > On 2013-02-15, at 7:21 AM, Rick Macklem wrote: >=20 > >> > > Righto. Thanks jhb and kib for looking at this. > > > > Btw John, PBDRY still gets set for sleeps in the sys/rpc code. > > However, > > as far as I can tell, it just sets TDF_SBDRY when it is already set > > and seems harmless. (Since this code is supposed to be generic and > > not > > specific to NFS, maybe it should stay that way?) > > > > Also, since PBDRY on the sleeps sets TDF_SBDRY, I think the above > > patch > > is ok for stable/9 without your recent head patch. > > > > Maybe Marc can test the above patch? >=20 > 'k, not sure what you want me to 'test', but so far, patch has been > applied / live for ~21hrs, and no processes in state T =E2=80=A6 >=20 Yes, I meant run it like you normally do and see if the hang occurs with the patch (or other problems crop up). I suspect you have some idea of how long it needs to run without a hang before you are convinced the problem is fixed. I can't do commits until April, so there is no rush from my point of view. (I suspect jhb@ will commit it at some point, if/when it appears to fix the problem and seems correct.) Thanks for testing it, rick >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"