From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 17:47:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EFA5106564A for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 17:47:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0AEF8FC0A for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 17:47:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.30.101.53] ([209.117.142.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p38HhMjc031230 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 8 Apr 2011 11:43:24 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: <20110408155520.GA40792@cheddar.urgle.com> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 11:43:16 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: <4D9EFAC6.4020906@lazybytes.org> <7EA5889E-77EF-4BAE-9655-C33692A75602@bsdimp.com> <4D9F2C88.4010205@lazybytes.org> <20110408155520.GA40792@cheddar.urgle.com> To: Mike Bristow X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (harmony.bsdimp.com [10.0.0.6]); Fri, 08 Apr 2011 11:43:24 -0600 (MDT) Cc: FreeBSD Hackers , Sergey Vinogradov Subject: Re: ifconfig output: ipv4 netmask format X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:47:28 -0000 On Apr 8, 2011, at 9:55 AM, Mike Bristow wrote: > On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 07:40:56PM +0400, Sergey Vinogradov wrote: >> On 08.04.2011 19:23, Warner Losh wrote: >>> On Apr 8, 2011, at 6:08 AM, Sergey Vinogradov wrote: >>> If we really wanted to make it human readable, we'd output 10.2.3.4/24 >> >> So, maybe, while following the POLA, we should add an option, as Daniel >> mentioned above? To output the CIDR? > > Non-contigous netmasks are legal in IPv4. What do you do if someone adds > the CIDR flag but the netmask cannot be represented in CIDR notation? They have become illegal in the fullness of time. Warner