Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 18:09:07 -0500 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: Thomas Mueller <mueller6722@twc.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version Message-ID: <20170627230907.GA30811@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <EE.2B.03057.CB7C2595@dnvrco-omsmta02> References: <fa33d0e8-67cb-ab06-9a58-26dafe250f6c@freebsd.org> <6d35f70b-17f2-d864-68ed-a3637cdc9fbf@gjunka.com> <63e5c4e30a60d51c5a068177b9483206@acheronmedia.hr> <ED.02.03935.A361E495@dnvrco-omsmta01> <8948545b-5269-8a0e-3f92-9dfd02f227c1@gjunka.com> <B7.46.01815.DD65F495@dnvrco-omsmta03> <310d8cf4-3549-aca7-5666-b3496707917e@heuristicsystems.com.au> <61.E4.01815.93B02595@dnvrco-omsmta03> <20170627175635.GB29356@lonesome.com> <EE.2B.03057.CB7C2595@dnvrco-omsmta02>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 09:01:39PM +0000, Thomas Mueller wrote: > raising the possibility of building for other targets. Which is very much not hardly even the same as "they are being resistant to change". In fact, about as far away from it as is possible to get. "techinically possible" != "feasible in the immediate future". I feel like I'm repeating myself in this thread, again. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170627230907.GA30811>