From owner-freebsd-rc@freebsd.org  Mon May 23 10:28:10 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-rc@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 538DAB475C8
 for <freebsd-rc@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>; Mon, 23 May 2016 10:28:10 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 445EF1D2D
 for <freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 23 May 2016 10:28:10 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4NASApJ046308
 for <freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 23 May 2016 10:28:10 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 209577] rc.d/ntpd relies on inconsistent file timestamps
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 10:28:10 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System
X-Bugzilla-Component: misc
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People
X-Bugzilla-Who: rwmaillists@googlemail.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: Rejected
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-209577-4805-BWUnnghedw@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-209577-4805@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-209577-4805@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation."
 <freebsd-rc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-rc>,
 <mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-rc/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-rc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-rc>,
 <mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 10:28:10 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D209577

--- Comment #5 from rwmaillists@googlemail.com ---
I originally brought this up because someone had a problem with the IERS co=
py.
I probably didn't make myself clear in the previous post, but the script
doesn't work properly even if you stay with the IETF version. The downloaded
copy isn't overwriting the working copy from the 10.3 install because they =
have
different expiry times but the same time-stamp.

The reason for checking the timestamp is to prevent the expiry going backwa=
rds,
comparing the actual expiry time would make everything just work.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=