Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 16:26:28 -0500 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: Mark Johnston <markj@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-bugbusters@freebsd.org Subject: Re: closing fixed PRs Message-ID: <CAF6rxgn6MJYr9mvFrqYApzXYyLAo6djE7AACntujEUj37%2BOAhQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20121221210755.GB23513@oddish.home> References: <20121221210755.GB23513@oddish.home>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 21 December 2012 16:07, Mark Johnston <markj@freebsd.org> wrote: > Hello, > > There are a few PRs (166994 and 169642 for example) where the reported > issue has been independantly fixed and the submitter doesn't seem to be > interested in a patch for their tree. What's the right way to handle > them? I don't see any reason for them to stay open. I was thinking of > setting them to feedback mode and waiting a week before closing them. Is > this alright? If you are sure the reported issue has been fixed please set them to patched - if it has not yet been MFCed closed - if it has been MFCed or never will be in the message please mention the relevant commit numbers please assign them to the committer who fixed it. example: change-pr -p -T markj -m "fixed in r12345 - will be MFCed shortly" docs/78965 -- Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgn6MJYr9mvFrqYApzXYyLAo6djE7AACntujEUj37%2BOAhQ>