From owner-dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Thu May 20 23:30:23 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: dev-commits-ports-main@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F27BC64B24D; Thu, 20 May 2021 23:30:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from osa@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FmQvf6DSCz4WP1; Thu, 20 May 2021 23:30:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from osa@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1621553422; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=OQ92On+yrbYvIwbJijrNvwTu4I96NjEhaFLH8t6nKdY=; b=i7j+k8X/C7UEb2czV9K4IXmDSGuDBrj19g1+1PXFRlaxhPWr90c/zqBXT44MF7uYvjhbFc FoqZH/0jz7HGdYhglXJjAN5lnKiez24nSc2t9i9CXC5rrotECrnluH95bhXo3tHFJcl1h+ Hz31KIbzoNgKl70J8WghMI1i2KmsYBasH0D4EFfltYzZxjJLtLnJYdMVxFyG3hzWzWOjgL ZmBsHJNcbHAe2GoxVa/mSoHJqRqmoXwGiEDZ30lfOUlvW8H8rlUaG/OMGqru2lzEN4vFR3 5qTAZAXCtRJhW/Voc6u164et2U683XRtJQuJh2I8iRivEA/KQWIRv0SFzacEpg== Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 975) id C69071C427; Thu, 20 May 2021 23:30:22 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 23:30:22 +0000 From: "Sergey A. Osokin" To: Ryan Steinmetz Cc: Mark Linimon , ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: cc298297bc51 - main - www/nginx: Undo previous commit Message-ID: References: <202105201640.14KGe1ZO031052@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <20210520195721.GA9374@lonesome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BhNyzwO2ehUP9r2O" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1621553422; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=OQ92On+yrbYvIwbJijrNvwTu4I96NjEhaFLH8t6nKdY=; b=gnKcIXdjBG3hzIJcgu8Dygvz4WP2vN/lNxU4rSL7/gMRojs5SxOhWzEXh+TdEIas0kY90B fMhbntff3adk6L0viBMYnffu8y/QWaYOpT9Z1aPos3HsW0jsq35LpPRT4oUl+ETulZSshb ezKYULG90U8hYTUpDWpeYyJh7BMZLJgEbt7sfAdkDmzwXnNINi9+gHR9Pc0Tz94+8q46Vh iafgotGYaWj1htvF5xyGkXuiEc5ZYbhq9kN2g3KDKjEU4mkb9TUgjGiP5kkKqc5QxrR/Gw 6DISE8/yCS2kdXQgdlIxIcfZJkcIw+NB6BAQPZuY3IhAVG/khtEXdogQaiq3xA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1621553422; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=LQ/AC9vC2DbSw1lHvdLgnbwS377IUd2F7VMNsYB68+L5scT7YPY6VszGJ/Myaic2sU61EM vrZgstE8nmVoNQE6rzZ5KVqK3+ui97gvTbduFQnSeypAtpVeyrVXPGXa5jA3JLAqQKySp6 Tb+99fjPyenQm5/1Od+8h5CUeGENeoVyYDkrdKeTJbW4lKFpRteUxzdw+uCeBT0DqlMvIs ofwu3kX7gV0I+LTnNAMC0tm4I68h6VManUo0ru4++Lq+2cCdO2J6qHsbdGb29gnVSXHDY0 OmWUCXvtajsHFe5+x1jjH+P1ynN+YTRTXn6xiVCMRpk85UrQ44igbCCq6oh82w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Commits to the main branch of the FreeBSD ports repository List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 23:30:23 -0000 --BhNyzwO2ehUP9r2O Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 06:49:53PM -0400, Ryan Steinmetz wrote: > On (05/20/21 22:14), Sergey A. Osokin wrote: > > > >There're hundreds and hundfreds patches are available with a different > >quality. Are we really on position to add all of those just because > >they're not enabled by default? Really? >=20 > I'm not adding hundreds of patches. I'm re-adding one, to the more than = 80=20 > existing addons/patches/modules that are options in the www/nginx port=20 > today. > > Almost all of which exist because the nginx development team have not cho= sen=20 > to make their functionality native. NGINX development team already reviewed this patch for all of us and report= ed it doesn't add value. Also, there's no evidence that this patch adds any valu= e. What is the reason to add the patch back? Just because the port had it in the past? --=20 Sergey --BhNyzwO2ehUP9r2O Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQITBAEBCgB9FiEEZTMJYdHlAQrZCsSmOBlAga+KbzQFAmCm8QpfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDY1 MzMwOTYxRDFFNTAxMEFEOTBBQzRBNjM4MTk0MDgxQUY4QTZGMzQACgkQOBlAga+K bzRdZQv8Dmvu0CAdnsJxR+cupk39K2+n5NgINOpprP8jmRs80mo/3Dq/m5Klna9u QtA/r4xUBjHiw9CkmoDN4qMyMld7a/9T4T4c4kvx7XH44k+tl+fkPl76rI8GzqeQ 6fet9VVFO/mqVO2f9x0ybCOEnVYSYax8e1Tj7E3BqC11b9Tqe7HqnDT7SN3DjdJo gWR8fO8/T+dtOe4pjH3Rex9ImW7NuAh9AzqTBTMnSs8FGAT1r8sT5DD+/zlxvZ7V 98dDPYlnMHSLO9FW31CS5mt7Ewdj/3iHotyiR9qWPdz/kICl7YViYgyKAUwhXUgN DiWlAM818tYyVr+SmAOOCs0YPskr6r5OmXHdgsUbQerQ+QAvfKPgnnjgSzhL5qxQ gGrKh0XFoADcn4Lnyno4Vw+dD32gKPqgj9UWtk6qRJ/WbpfU+VXUqMwZey+cQGf2 pxefBqiKeETDXLNpeIuZFFuMoemn9F4pBLIhh7/K00BPEpa5sgva2v6f8YixeYAh 6Xmx63x5 =EvYc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BhNyzwO2ehUP9r2O--