From owner-freebsd-arch Sat Dec 22 16:21:43 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from winston.freebsd.org (adsl-64-173-15-98.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net [64.173.15.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABB8637B417; Sat, 22 Dec 2001 16:21:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from winston.freebsd.org (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fBN0LHG33487; Sat, 22 Dec 2001 16:21:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@winston.freebsd.org) To: The Anarcat Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG, jkh@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sysctl kern.disks shouldn't have to sort its output In-Reply-To: Message from The Anarcat of "Sat, 22 Dec 2001 18:08:00 EST." <20011222230759.GD530@shall.anarcat.dyndns.org> Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 16:21:16 -0800 Message-ID: <33483.1009066876@winston.freebsd.org> From: Jordan Hubbard Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Anyways. If the sorting belongs to the kernel, I could do it. > > However, I think it belongs to libdisk, so I'll start working on a patch > there. The sorting could be in libdisk, I just suggested the kernel so that other consumers of the kern.disks sysctl variable wouldn't have to sort it as well. One assumes that more than libdisk might want to get at this data. In any case, for this particular case doing it in libdisk would be fine. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message