From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Dec 20 03:37:17 1995
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id DAA15435
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 03:37:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id DAA15430
          for <current@freefall.freebsd.org>; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 03:37:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.7.3/8.6.9) id DAA03249; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 03:37:01 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 03:37:01 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199512201137.DAA03249@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au
CC: nate@rocky.sri.MT.net, jkh@time.cdrom.com, current@freefall.freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <199512192252.JAA10809@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> (message from Michael Smith on Wed, 20 Dec 1995 09:21:59 +1030 (CST))
Subject: Re: pcnfsd..
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

 * If it moves, so does samba and that DHCP daemon that I keep hearing about 8)
 * I'd say that they get an awful lot more use than pcnfsd. (Or would if 
 * people knew about them 8)

Hmm.

Jordan, can you please explain why it can't be happy as a
port/package?  I can't understand why putting it in the main
distribution is going to win over a binary package, which is even on
the CD!

Satoshi