From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 11 19:47:27 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFAB016A417; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 19:47:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.netplex.net (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D9EF13C458; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 19:47:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.netplex.net (8.14.1/8.14.1/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id l9BJlOM2005290; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:47:24 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.netplex.net) X-Greylist: Message whitelisted by DRAC access database, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.10]); Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:47:24 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:47:24 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net To: "David O'Brien" In-Reply-To: <20071011193914.GA46899@dragon.NUXI.org> Message-ID: References: <200710091342.l99DgZDB097501@repoman.freebsd.org> <20071011085836.GC14241@team.vega.ru> <20071011172823.GB43603@dragon.NUXI.org> <200710111422.44320.jhb@freebsd.org> <20071011193914.GA46899@dragon.NUXI.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, John Baldwin , cvs-src@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, Ruslan Ermilov , Dag-Erling =?unknown-8bit?B?U23DuHJncmF2?= Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile.inc1 UPDATING src/cddl/lib Makefile src/cddl/usr.bin Makefile src/cddl/usr.sbin Makefile src/lib Makefile src/lib/libkse Makefile kse.map pthread.map src/lib/libkse/arch/amd64 Makefile.inc src/lib/libkse/arch/amd64/amd64 ... X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Eischen List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 19:47:27 -0000 Whatever happened to renumbering all symbol versioned libraries to libfoo.0? Or even libfoo.0.0. The whole point of symbol versioning is that we don't need to bump library versions for ABI breakage. -- DE