From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 30 08:29:48 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE0F6706 for ; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 08:29:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cell.glebius.int.ru (glebius.int.ru [81.19.69.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66B8412E7 for ; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 08:29:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cell.glebius.int.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.glebius.int.ru (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rAU8TeGT042139 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 30 Nov 2013 12:29:40 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.glebius.int.ru (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id rAU8TdZ2042138; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 12:29:39 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: cell.glebius.int.ru: glebius set sender to glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 12:29:39 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Ilya Bakulin Subject: Re: unbound-control in FreeBSD-CURRENT and stable/10 Message-ID: <20131130082939.GJ90895@FreeBSD.org> References: <20131129142143.GA29437@olymp.kibab.com> <20131129142729.GA29580@olymp.kibab.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131129142729.GA29580@olymp.kibab.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 08:29:48 -0000 Ilya, On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 03:27:29PM +0100, Ilya Bakulin wrote: I> about two months ago DES has imported unbound(1) and a couple of related I> utilities in FreeBSD-HEAD. This is good, but now unbound-control is being I> installed in /usr/bin. That means, if the user wants to install Unbound from I> ports, typing unbound-control will still use FreeBSD-shipped Unbound, not the I> one from Ports. This will work as long as the unbound-control API is stable I> and no new commands are added. But at some point this may cause problems. Shouldn't /usr/local/bin be earlier in your $PATH than /usr/bin? -- Totus tuus, Glebius.