Date: 28 Apr 1998 19:10:01 +0200 From: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling Coidan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ) To: dyson@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: dec@phoenix.its.rpi.edu (David E. Cross), freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SIGDANGER Message-ID: <xzpd8e1zxcm.fsf@hrotti.ifi.uio.no> In-Reply-To: "John S. Dyson"'s message of "Mon, 27 Apr 1998 17:30:38 -0500 (EST)" References: <199804272230.RAA01545@dyson.iquest.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"John S. Dyson" <dyson@FreeBSD.ORG> writes: > David E. Cross said: > > I was recenlty shown AIX's SIGDANGER (33). It is a signal that the kernel > We do need to adopt an extended signal set, and I think that someone > else has already developed it. SIGDANGER could be valuable. I also think SIGCONF which was discussed on one of the lists some time ago (last week?) would be nice (as a replacement for the old tradition of reading a SIGHUP as "your configurations files have changed, please reread them now") -- Noone else has a .sig like this one. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpd8e1zxcm.fsf>