From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Mar 4 11:18:19 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from scaup.prod.itd.earthlink.net (scaup.prod.itd.earthlink.net [207.217.121.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C1AA37B718 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2001 11:18:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fmela0@sm.socccd.cc.ca.us) Received: from sm.socccd.cc.ca.us (pool0144.cvx15-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net [209.179.44.144]) by scaup.prod.itd.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA11865 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2001 11:18:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3AA29546.7D709D6@sm.socccd.cc.ca.us> Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2001 11:19:34 -0800 From: Farooq Mela Reply-To: fmela0@sm.socccd.cc.ca.us X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: pthread_exit proto Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, Could someone with CVS write access make the following change in pthread.h void pthread_exit __P((void *)); to void pthread_exit __P((void *)) __dead2; as this function doesnt return and gcc is giving me some annoying warnings ;-) BTW, what is the standard mechanism for submitting a patch such as this. I know this probably isn't the really correct place to post this... --- -farooq To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message