From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Feb  1 04:33:29 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id EAA22865
          for current-outgoing; Thu, 1 Feb 1996 04:33:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tfs.com (tfs.com [140.145.250.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id EAA22850
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 1 Feb 1996 04:33:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from critter.tfs.com by tfs.com (smail3.1.28.1) with SMTP
	id m0thyCZ-0003wNC; Thu, 1 Feb 96 04:33 PST
Received: from localhost.tfs.com (localhost.tfs.com [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id NAA08373 for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 1 Feb 1996 13:33:23 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: critter.tfs.com: Host localhost.tfs.com didn't use HELO protocol
To: current@freebsd.org
Subject: ip_fw ordering of rules..
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 1996 13:33:22 +0100
Message-ID: <8371.823178002@critter.tfs.com>
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com>
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk


Does anybody but me find the ordering IP_FW does weird ?

I'd like to kick it out entirely, but at least an option to
disable it is in order...

What do other users of it think ?

Poul-Henning