From owner-freebsd-python@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 12 15:37:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: python@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EAAC106566B; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 15:37:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias.andree@tu-dortmund.de) Received: from unimail.uni-dortmund.de (mx1.HRZ.Uni-Dortmund.DE [129.217.128.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F36C68FC13; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 15:37:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webmail.tu-dortmund.de (vmx028.itmc.tu-dortmund.de [129.217.131.82]) by unimail.uni-dortmund.de (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1CFNrrg023668; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:23:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from 77.183.132.29 (SquirrelMail authenticated user smmaandr) by webmail.tu-dortmund.de with HTTP; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:23:53 +0100 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:23:53 +0100 From: "Matthias Andree" To: miwi@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: python@FreeBSD.org, Matthias Andree , portmgr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: python26 doesn't build on 7.3 tinderbox amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-python@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Python issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 15:37:45 -0000 > Hi, > > I also can't confirm that, but i remember i saw this happened to some > tinderboxes. mostly it was on zfs with tmpfs or ccache. Please check ur TB > setup. > > Regards Martin > > PS: all python packages on pointyhat are also fine. OK, fine. I've rid my computer (8.2-PREREL. kernel) of ZFS (for various reasons, notably (1) unbearable slow speed with full disks - note this is a WD RE3 drive and a quadcore CPU -, and (2) incapability to delete big files without truncating them first on ZFS) and give it another spin. UFS+journalling is a hell of a lot faster than ZFS for sure, even on a slower (5400/min green Samsung) disk... I'll then update the PR with my findings or just close it as ZFS artifact. Thanks for the feedback and ZFS pointer already. Best regards -- Matthias Andree