From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 18 08:08:14 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1149337B401 for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2003 08:08:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com (ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com [24.92.226.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E616943FA3 for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2003 08:08:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tparquet@twcny.rr.com) Received: from twcny.rr.com (syr-24-59-143-77.twcny.rr.com [24.59.143.77]) h7IF87s4002528 for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2003 11:08:08 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3F40EBD7.8080909@twcny.rr.com> Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 11:08:07 -0400 From: Tom Parquette User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030805 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: What is the actual status of Audigy2 support in 5.1-CURRENT? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 15:08:15 -0000 Hi. I would like to get an Audigy2 Platnum card working on my AMD dual processor system. I'm 5.1-CURRENT but I tend to hang back a little. I have "device pcm" and "device sbc" in the kernel. When the system didn't figure out the card I added "device firewire" "device sbp" and "device fwe" to the kernel to see if the probes could figure out the firewire interface. The system appears to locate the firewire components of the card. It does not seem to understand the sound component. I get the following at boot time: pci2: at device 5.0 (no driver attached) I was following the discussion on the -current list about the Sound Blaster Audigy2 support. I do not know if the discussion continued off list but I suspect it might have. A dogpile search turned up a patch file emu10k2.txt. From the discussion thread in bsdforums I was unable to determine if this was the same patch file also mentioned in the -current mailing list threads. The first few lines of the patch file I have read: diff -u old-emu10k1/emu10k1.c new-emu10k2/emu10k1.c --- old-emu10k1/emu10k1.c Mon Feb 10 03:01:34 2003 +++ new-emu10k2/emu10k1.c Thu Feb 13 05:36:10 2003 @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ /* + * Copyright (c) 2003 Orlando Bassotto Whereis does not tell me the location of emu10k1.c. Can someone in the know clear this up for me? Thanks...