From owner-freebsd-advocacy Tue Sep 12 21:51:45 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from sanson.reyes.somos.net (freyes.static.inch.com [216.223.199.224]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C6F37B424; Tue, 12 Sep 2000 21:51:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tomasa (tomasa.reyes.somos.net [10.0.0.11]) by sanson.reyes.somos.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id AAA32719; Wed, 13 Sep 2000 00:41:41 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from fran@reyes.somos.net) Message-Id: <200009130441.AAA32719@sanson.reyes.somos.net> From: "Francisco Reyes" To: "Jordan Hubbard" Cc: "billf@FreeBSD.ORG" , "freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG" , "Stan Osborne" Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 00:10:41 -0400 Reply-To: "Francisco Reyes" X-Mailer: PMMail 2000 Professional (2.10.2010) For Windows 98 (4.10.2222) In-Reply-To: <11379.968820291@winston.osd.bsdi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: advocacy/21238: poor performance; missed opportunities Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 12 Sep 2000 21:44:51 -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote: >Actually, should you dispute the closing of any PR it's also possible >for you to get it opened again and to also post follow-ups to it Thanks for the info. I think that many times one doesn't write all the needed data, but to simply have the PR closed instead of asking for more info is very frustrating to the end user. francisco Moderator of the Corporate BSD list http://www.egroups.com/group/BSD_Corporate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message