From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 24 18:04:10 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 269EA569; Fri, 24 May 2013 18:04:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john@theusgroup.com) Received: from theusgroup.com (theusgroup.com [64.122.243.222]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09A4C689; Fri, 24 May 2013 18:04:10 +0000 (UTC) From: John To: "Michael L. Squires" Subject: Re: Apparent fxp regression in FreeBSD 8.4-RC3 In-reply-to: References: <20130508174721.GD1651@glenbarber.us> <20130524010943.GA37252@icarus.home.lan> <20130524012117.GE1672@glenbarber.us> Comments: In-reply-to "Michael L. Squires" message dated "Fri, 24 May 2013 08:51:00 -0400." Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 11:04:07 -0700 Message-Id: <20130524180408.0A297A86@server.theusgroup.com> Cc: Jeremy Chadwick , YongHyeon PYUN , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, Craig Rodrigues , Glen Barber , FreeBSD Release Engineering Team X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 18:04:10 -0000 > >I agree that this seems to be a problem only experienced by those still >using the fxp interface and DHCP on a certain subset of Supermicro >systems, which has to be a very small group. > This isn't entirely correct. The test box I used has an Intel Pro 100 pci card plugged into an Intel motherboard. fxp0: port 0xe000-0xe03f mem 0xfe600000-0xfe600fff,0xfe500000-0xfe5fffff irq 22 at device 1.0 on pci3 miibus0: on fxp0 inphy0: PHY 1 on miibus0 John Theus TheUsGroup.com