From owner-freebsd-bugs  Fri Feb 28 22:40:52 1997
Return-Path: <owner-bugs>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA14128
          for bugs-outgoing; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 22:40:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA14118
          for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 22:40:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id WAA01938; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 22:40:13 -0800 (PST)
To: Charles Henrich <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu>
cc: bde@zeta.org.au, mpp@freefall.freebsd.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: mail.local modifications? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 01 Mar 1997 01:29:12 EST."
             <199703010629.BAA09181@crh.cl.msu.edu> 
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 22:40:13 -0800
Message-ID: <1934.857198413@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> And thats one hudred percent and completely acceptable and accepted behavior.
> The problem is that the patch DID work, I didnt cut'n'paste, I read it in wit
h
> VI, made extra sure it was perfect, applied it twice to my source copies,
> before sending it in.  The comment I got back was "its got spaces in it" whic
h
> it did, and I took as meaning he didnt like my spaces.  Not that it didnt
> apply.

Ah, I took it the latter way.  Bruce, perhaps you'd care to enlighten
both of us? :-)

						Jordan