From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Apr 28 16:26: 7 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from fep1-orange.clear.net.nz (fep1-orange.clear.net.nz [203.97.32.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C7211545A for ; Wed, 28 Apr 1999 16:25:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jabley@buddha.clear.net.nz) Received: from buddha.clear.net.nz (buddha.clear.net.nz [192.168.24.106]) by fep1-orange.clear.net.nz (1.5/1.11) with ESMTP id LAA14293; Thu, 29 Apr 1999 11:25:46 +1200 (NZST) Received: (from jabley@localhost) by buddha.clear.net.nz (8.9.3/8.9.2) id LAA82372; Thu, 29 Apr 1999 11:25:38 +1200 (NZST) (envelope-from jabley) Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 11:25:38 +1200 From: Joe Abley To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: jabley@clear.co.nz Subject: Re: Adding desktop support Message-ID: <19990429112538.D81921@clear.co.nz> References: <199904282017.NAA01044@dingo.cdrom.com>; <19990429083638.B34373.kithrup.freebsd.hackers@gurney.reilly.home> <199904282244.PAA28325@kithrup.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i In-Reply-To: <199904282244.PAA28325@kithrup.com>; from Sean Eric Fagan on Wed, Apr 28, 1999 at 03:44:47PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Apr 28, 1999 at 03:44:47PM -0700, Sean Eric Fagan wrote: > Putting icons in the executable itself is pretty stupid -- it's a single > instance of something that a window manager can use, and there are much > less-invasive ways of doing the same thing. What's invasive about it? [not trying to go wild with advocacy-fever, just wondering what downside there is to this apart from taking up a little more disk space] Joe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message