From owner-freebsd-security  Mon Apr 29 12:48:05 1996
Return-Path: owner-security
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id MAA06881
          for security-outgoing; Mon, 29 Apr 1996 12:48:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mistery.mcafee.com (jimd@mistery.mcafee.com [192.187.128.69])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA06839
          for <security@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Apr 1996 12:48:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from jimd@localhost) by mistery.mcafee.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id MAA01121; Mon, 29 Apr 1996 12:45:46 -0700
From: Jim Dennis <jimd@mistery.mcafee.com>
Message-Id: <199604291945.MAA01121@mistery.mcafee.com>
Subject: Re: Q on using "netpipes" for firewall maintanance tasks
To: pst@shockwave.com (Paul Traina)
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 1996 12:45:45 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: stesin@elvisti.kiev.ua, firewalls@greatcircle.com, security@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199604281655.JAA00331@precipice.shockwave.com> from "Paul Traina" at Apr 28, 96 09:55:10 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-security@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> 
>   From: "Andrew V. Stesin" <stesin@elvisti.kiev.ua>
>   Subject: Q on using "netpipes" for firewall maintanance tasks
>   Hello people,
>   
>   I'm now in a search for safer but convenient rsh(1) replacement for some
>   tasks of firewall day-to-day operation, i.e. gathering some stats, etc.
>   to an inside machine.  Firewall is composed of FreeBeasts (I like
>   that spelling of FreeBSD! :)  no fancy black Cisco boxen for filtering
>   routers.

	What's wrong with ssh?  Can't it do authenticated, encrypted
	rsh and rlogin?

Jim Dennis,
System Administrator,
McAfee Associates