From owner-freebsd-security Thu Mar 14 10:45:38 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from tulum.brsys.com (dnai-216-15-45-74.cust.dnai.com [216.15.45.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E90037B419; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 10:45:34 -0800 (PST) Received: (from adamw@localhost) by tulum.brsys.com (8.10.0/8.10.0) id g2EJ8PF07356; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 11:08:25 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20020314110824.B7150@brsys.com> Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 11:08:24 -0800 From: Adam Wight To: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG, batz Cc: Mark Foster , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Managing port security upgrades (was:Re: PHP 4.1.2) References: <200203132050.g2DKoWP52263@bmah.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i In-Reply-To: <200203132050.g2DKoWP52263@bmah.dyndns.org>; from Bruce A. Mah on Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 12:50:32PM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I think I should clarify that the original problem was bringing specific port Makefiles, patches, etc. up-to-date in a low-bandwidth fashion, not simply getting the distfiles. -adam On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 12:50:32PM -0800, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > If memory serves me right, batz wrote: > > On 13 Mar 2002, Mark Foster wrote: > > > > :Sounds alot like > > :pkg_version -c -v | sh > > : > > :(assuming an updated ports tree) > > > > Yeah, it does. So much for streamlining. Somebody > > close the patent office, everything has been invented. > > Please RTFM for pkg_version(8), paying particular attention to the > warnings *against* doing this very thing. > > Bruce. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message