From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Jun  7  6:12:24 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from probity.mcc.ac.uk (probity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.94])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id AE6BF37B403; Fri,  7 Jun 2002 06:12:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97])
	by probity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #7)
	id 17GJXH-000Ol9-00; Fri, 7 Jun 2002 14:12:11 +0100
Received: (from jcm@localhost)
	by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.11.6/8.11.1) id g57DCAT84182;
	Fri, 7 Jun 2002 14:12:10 +0100 (BST)
	(envelope-from jcm)
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 14:12:10 +0100
From: j mckitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
Cc: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>,
	John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: SMP/5.0 performance on single CPU?
Message-ID: <20020607141209.A84104@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
References: <20020607125004.A83543@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <12364.1023453867@critter.freebsd.dk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i
In-Reply-To: <12364.1023453867@critter.freebsd.dk>; from phk@critter.freebsd.dk on Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 02:44:27PM +0200
X-Scanner: exiscan *17GJXH-000Ol9-00*HQ5NoSiJ.LY* (Manchester Computing, University of Manchester)
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-hackers.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-hackers>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-hackers>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 02:44:27PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
| In message <20020607125004.A83543@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>, j mckitrick writes:
| >| On the other hand, there are numerous new features (GEOM, TrustedBSD,
| >| OpenPAM, Snapshots + background fsck, etc) being implemented in 5.x that
| >
| 
| >Other than devfs (which I haven't investigated yet) it seems most of
| >these features are extras, not the basics, correct?  Other than SMP, of
| >course.
| 
| It is the intent that GEOM will be standard (or basics if you like).

But this will be one of those transparent features, correct?


NOTE: Please CC me, as I am not currently subscribed.  Thanks.

jm
-- 
My other computer is your windows box.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message