From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 18 13:51:47 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9079716A4CF for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:51:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from shaft.techsupport.co.uk (shaft.techsupport.co.uk [212.250.77.214]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7216643FE5 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:51:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from setantae@submonkey.net) Received: from cpc2-cdif3-6-0-cust204.cdif.cable.ntl.com ([81.103.67.204] helo=shrike.submonkey.net ident=mailnull) by shaft.techsupport.co.uk with esmtp (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD 4.9) id 1AMDl9-000Kc8-Km; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 21:51:43 +0000 Received: from setantae by shrike.submonkey.net with local (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD 4.9) id 1AMDk2-00054M-RR; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 21:50:34 +0000 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 21:50:34 +0000 From: Ceri Davies To: Arjan van Leeuwen Message-ID: <20031118215034.GN385@submonkey.net> Mail-Followup-To: Ceri Davies , Arjan van Leeuwen , advocacy@freebsd.org References: <200311182219.09828.avleeuwen@piwebs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="QxIEt88oQPsT6QmF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200311182219.09828.avleeuwen@piwebs.com> X-PGP: finger ceri@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Ceri Davies cc: advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCO goes after BSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 21:51:47 -0000 --QxIEt88oQPsT6QmF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 10:19:07PM +0100, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote: Content-Description: signed data > From http://www.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=3D03/11/18/1742216 : >=20 > (about the teleconference today) > I, for one, don't care how SCO pays its counsel. But I do care about=20 > something new that came out of the teleconference.=20 >=20 > SCO is going to attack the 1994 AT&T/BSD settlement. That's a very intere= sting=20 > item that the few favored analysts (and only a select few journalists) wh= o=20 > were allowed to ask questions failed to pick up on. Here's our take on wh= y=20 > SCO is embarking on this new course of action: >=20 > (read the article for more info) >=20 > What to think of this? It's difficult to say when the only quote on the page is "broad and deep". I would rather see exactly what SCO said regarding the 1994 settlement before making my mind up, but my gut reaction is that someone has been at the crack pipe again. Ceri --=20 --QxIEt88oQPsT6QmF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/upQqocfcwTS3JF8RAgIpAJ4p7iUMFhVWBGL8b6htzMNQFCj9PwCfVUp/ HTi+tov/DV2OlIY+m3ulwZA= =Eqpo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --QxIEt88oQPsT6QmF--