From owner-freebsd-current Wed Feb 22 19:22:26 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id TAA16220 for current-outgoing; Wed, 22 Feb 1995 19:22:26 -0800 Received: from trout.sri.MT.net (trout.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.12]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id TAA16213 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 1995 19:22:07 -0800 Received: (from nate@localhost) by trout.sri.MT.net (8.6.9/8.6.9) id UAA17345; Wed, 22 Feb 1995 20:24:55 -0700 Date: Wed, 22 Feb 1995 20:24:55 -0700 From: Nate Williams Message-Id: <199502230324.UAA17345@trout.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: "Russell L. Carter" "Re: TRUE and FALSE -> is this true?" (Feb 22, 6:52pm) X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92) To: "Russell L. Carter" , current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: TRUE and FALSE -> is this true? Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > |Starting from a running system, you are guaranteed to get everything working > |with 2 make worlds, and a 3rd certainly shouldn't hurt. > > For those of us suping current regularly, and having the make world > occasionally fail, does this imply that it might work to try make world > twice? (Or three times?) No, it implies that if a release is to be done, then make world should work. If make world doesn't work, then the release isn't ready. So, assuming a make world works, then it should work multiple times. Nate