Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 16:36:22 +0100 From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> To: George Kontostanos <gkontos.mail@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PHP 5.4.0 : lang/php54 Message-ID: <CADLo83_-UOWSc_suztjLBk0xYu_wu1TSN29Nwarn=nsFRv_TFQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CA%2BdUSyp2ztuZdCocnpNCgf-h%2BJO4zMMFEMi_xrm8nbwQ2W9How@mail.gmail.com> References: <CA%2BdUSyp2ztuZdCocnpNCgf-h%2BJO4zMMFEMi_xrm8nbwQ2W9How@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On May 21, 2012 4:17 PM, "George Kontostanos" <gkontos.mail@gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear all, > > I just wanted to understand why did php54 became the default php port. > > Considering that the majority of my clients want to stick with php53 > with the susosin patch, I can't blame them, it is really very annoying > that we have to schedule a down time window so that we migrate from > php to php53. > > Because currently there is no other way to do it unless you delete all > your php5 packages and recompile them again under php53. Sure, the web > server will still work even if you delete all php5 packages as long as > apache doesn't restart. But there are many applications who make > certain php cli calls. Those will not work! > > So, my question to the maintainers is, was there a particular reason > that made you take this decision? > > When would have been a better time? Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo83_-UOWSc_suztjLBk0xYu_wu1TSN29Nwarn=nsFRv_TFQ>