Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 23:49:55 -0400 (EDT) From: "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@area238.residence.gatech.edu> To: imp@village.org (Warner Losh) Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Stable question Message-ID: <199604100349.XAA02178@area238.residence.gatech.edu> In-Reply-To: <199604100042.SAA16995@rover.village.org> from Warner Losh at "Apr 9, 96 06:42:22 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I have a quick question about -stable. > > >From doing a cvs diff of RELENG_2_1_0 and RELENG_2_1_0_RELEASE it > would appear that there have been no kernel changes since the release > of 2.1R in the stable tree. Just some changes to ps, sh, and expr. > > I ran the diffs by doing a > cvs co -rRELENG_2_1_0 > then running > cvs diff -rRELENG_2_1_0_RELEASE -r RELENG_2_1_0 > and I came up with about 60k of changes, none of the kernel. > > Is this the case? Am I reading and running the diffs correctly? There have been some significant changes in the kernel, offhand I can think of the eisaconf stuff, ipfw changes, various driver improvements. % pwd /usr/src/sys % cvs diff -rRELENG_2_1_0_RELEASE -rRELENG_2_1_0 2>/dev/null |wc -l 21854 I'd guess there's something wrong with the way you did the diff, or maybe the checkout. One of the cvs gurus could better guess at that. Ken -- Kenneth Merry ken@area238.residence.gatech.edu Disclaimer: I don't speak for GTRI, GT, or Elvis.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199604100349.XAA02178>