From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Mar 11 18:19: 7 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from linux.ssc.nsu.ru (linux.ssc.nsu.ru [193.124.219.91]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E8C337B71D for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 18:18:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from danfe@inet.ssc.nsu.ru) Received: (qmail 2719 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2001 02:18:34 -0000 Received: from inet.ssc.nsu.ru (62.76.110.12) by hub.freebsd.org with SMTP; 12 Mar 2001 02:18:34 -0000 Received: from localhost (danfe@localhost) by inet.ssc.nsu.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA23988; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 08:17:45 +0600 Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 08:17:44 +0600 (NOVT) From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Jordan Hubbard Cc: thierry@herbelot.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Porting NVidia linux kernel modules to FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <20010311154131N.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > > So, are you saying that 3.3.6 performs better than 4.0.2? If this is true > > Absolutely. At least 2X the frame rate using the same OpenGL app in > each case. > But, this is when using hw accel on 3.3.6 vs. software "accel" on 4.0.2, right, like it would be in case of nvidia cards? Contrary, it cant' be *that* bad if I carry out these test with card that fully supports DRI. right? //danfe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message